The latest issue of Atomicpetals in now online. It's full of LJ folks too! I'm particularly proud of this one for a lot of reasons, but my real coup was getting Ken Light to agree to let me use some of his photos for a little piece on Texas' death row. He even said "no" at first, but I finally managed to charm him into relenting. He's my new hero.
The ice is melting. That means I have to go to work today and continue the capital murder trial. Non-death penalty case. We actually do have those in Texas, ya know.
Oh, and while I'm on the subject: FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
The ice is melting. That means I have to go to work today and continue the capital murder trial. Non-death penalty case. We actually do have those in Texas, ya know.
Oh, and while I'm on the subject: FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
From:
sad
From:
Re: sad
From:
no subject
nice work.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I think Anita would warn you that he may take that suggestion the wrong way...
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
p.s. You owe me mail!! Slacker! ;-P
From:
no subject
Thanks ver' much for sharing this with us, Cate!
From:
no subject
From:
FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
I take it that you agree with the Supreme Court decision here. You must be a very fair judge yourself. How do you deal with poorly represented defendants and prosecutors who try to stack the jury?
From:
Re: FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
Yeah, I do agree with it and I'm amazed at his cavalier dissent. I haven't read the whole thing yet because it makes me crazy to even remember that this idiot is on the Court. I'm not a judge, Don; I'm a prosecutor. But I do try to be fair, because THAT'S what the whole process is about. How do I deal with poorly represented defendants? I have on many occasions beeen a better defense attorney that the defendant's own lawyer. I don't try to screw defendants just because they have a shitty lawyer. My deal (plea bargain offer) is my deal, based on the facts of the case and the defendant's history. As for prosecutors who "stack the jury" I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean what was going on in the Dallas case? There the prosecutors were likely striking minority jurors based on race, a practice which has long been proscribed by law. I've never known anyone to do that in all my career, which is why I'm shocked that such a blatant case would have even made it all the way up to the Supreme Court. The real fault here lies with the Appeals courts that didn't shitcan such an obviously flawed verdict. I have no love for Miller-El...but he deserved a fair trial, just like every criminal defendant does.
Sorry to rant about it, but I really think that sometimes people don't realize that they generally only hear about the extremes. There are plenty of hardworking, bright people (on both sides--defense and prosecution) who work long hours for a joke of a paycheck because they actually BELIEVE in the concept of justice and doing right by people. But that's a whole other pet peeve of mine that I'll leave for another day. ; )
From:
Re: FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
From:
Re: FUCK YOU SIDEWAYS, CLARENCE THOMAS!
From:
hello
Thanks for all the beauty...
From:
Re: hello
From:
Re: hello